The village we live in usually holds an 'Open Gardens' event every July. Since, for obvious reasons, we couldn't hold it this year, I decided to wander round our garden with a camera. Anyone else who wants to wander round it can wander round it with me, online...
I should add that my other half's the gardener, not me (I just do the odd bit of donkey-work).
When we marvel at the
latest shots of the Rings of Saturn or the surface of Mars, we're not
unlike the Victorian public marvelling at the Great Exhibition,
dreaming of a technically-advanced future that lay just round the
corner. They couldn't know that the industrial revolution that gave
rise to the exhibition would also give rise to two world wars. Like
the visitors to the exhibition, what we're shown is the positive
side: the wonder, the courage, the ingenuity.
Until now, that is.
These days, billionaires seem to be blasting off into space all over
the place. The mainstream media sell it as just the sort of thing
these larger-than-life characters get up to. Space tourism, it seems,
is about to kick off. Something else to add to the bucket-list - if
you can afford it.
All very jolly. Okay,
it's a bit controversial but not that much. If you want to do
business in space it's the obvious place to start. I must admit,
seeing Branson and Bezos in their spaceships I couldn't help but be
reminded of Clive Sinclair driving around in his C-5. But, in a way,
that's what it's all about: setting up a new sideshow in the society
of the spectacle.
What's not dwelt on is
that the Martian landscapes we see when landers and orbiters relay
pictures back to earth could well be turned into quarries worked by
robot bulldozers or even test ranges for new WMDs. Space is a free-marketeer's dream. If past
experience is anything to go on, when we discover a pristine
environment we almost invariably go on to trash it. Once you're up
there there's going to be no original people to displace, fewer
competitors, no 'red tape' and no inconvenient public to protest
against what you're doing. Elon Musk's SpaceX has already said that
it doesn't intend to recognise international law on Mars.
Here on earth, as
things stand, it's becoming obvious that it's impossible to deal with
the climate crisis and continue with a growth based economy. Space,
though, is potentially lucrative. Jeff Bezos has said, 'We need to
take all the heavy industry, all polluting industry and move it into
space, and keep earth as this beautiful gem of a planet that it is.'
Behind this positive spin there is the reality that money is power. Putting aside the green-wash, in space, no government can tell you what to do. In the not-too-distant future it may
be more easy for entrepreneurs to make their money in space,
money that will serve to maintain into the future the power they
currently enjoy here on earth. They see space as their best chance to
continue with business as usual.
This is the new space
race. It has nothing to do with the limits of exploration and
everything to do with establishing economic control of the solar
system's resources. Again, in the not-to-distant future, we might
even see private robot-wars in space as corporations try to stake
their claims to mineral-rights, planets and asteroids. I don't think
this is far-fetched. After all, in the eighteenth century, the East
India Company came to rule large areas of India and exercise military
power there.
I'm sure the
entrepreneurs see all this very clearly. There's nothing to stop
them. And the winners will control the earth.
I recently gathered together a few recordings I'd made and uploaded them to Bandcamp. Okay, so free improvised music is a niche genre and somewhere at the back of that niche you'll find another even smaller niche set into the wall: avant-garde free improvised bass guitar solos. It may have as many as twenty fans around the world, most of whom listen to it in the hope that, if they do, the other nineteen might listen to their stuff. Okay, I'm one of them. What the hell...
If you don't like the music, have fun with the track titles and the allusion to the cover art in track 5, which is a bit (but not totally) different to the rest of the album.
By the way, bass instruments just don't come over on tiny speakers in devices. It really needs a good pair of headphones.
I've just been taking a bit of a break from blogging. As I mentioned two or three posts ago, I'm writing a book. It's been going well but I decided I really needed to get my head down and knock out more words. Words going into blog-posts aren't going into the book!
I've recently eased up on myself, though. The other day I wrote this. It actually follows on, I've just realised, from the last-but-one post, so I've included the video I posted then:
I went for a walk this
evening, as I often do, over the fields and up the hill opposite the
house. It's not one of those big hills, the names of which walkers
utter in hushed tones, just a humble bump in the ground, just steep
enough at its steepest part to get you breathing heavily. The air was
warm and still and the sky a deepening blue with just a scattering of
tiny clouds high up, grey tinged with pink.
To get there, I made my
way up the lane and along the edge of a field of young Holstein
heifers. They were inquisitive and came over to see what I was doing
there but, although they came close up to me they shied off when I
made any sudden movements. At the end of the field, where the hill
begins to steepen, I crossed a stile into a small wood which covers
the hillside at this point. I made my way up through the trees by the
side of a small beck that mysteriously vanishes underground, soaking
into the grass, a few yards from the stile. Half way up, I sat down
on its bank and ate a piece of chocolate. I could've sat there for a
long time, as it's a magical spot.
From where I sat, I
found myself thinking about my surroundings and the many layers of
memory and association I laid over it as I looked around. I could see
out through the trees to a wire fence and the field beyond it. This
was a piece of modern, managed farm-land. The trees had been planted
for a reason (there were signs that someone had been rearing
pheasants hereabouts in the recent past). Then there was my recent
past. I didn't grow up here: I moved here as an adult, out of
necessity, never dreaming that I'd stay put for almost half my life.
Having experienced 'step' relationships with people, it struck me
that, in a way, this place was my 'step home'. So much in life gets
changed or modified. Things get broken and then remade. It's neither
a perfect nor an imperfect situation. It's just the way it is.
Nevertheless, up to moving here I'd never stayed in one place for
long. I'm pleased I didn't know I'd still be here now when I moved
here all those years ago.
The landscape
hereabouts obviously holds all sorts of associations for me now.
Funnily enough though, I had not explored this wood until quite
recently. I was walking round filming in it only the other week. Over
the last three decades, I've often been out for local walks but if I
find a route I like I tend to repeat it. I suspect most people are
like that. We find comfort and pleasure in repetition. We don't set
out to systematically map an area in our minds.
Then there's the less
recent past, the times before any of us came along. To get here, I'd
walked over the gentle undulations of a medieval field system. Going
even further back, not far from here, my stepfather came across a
neolithic axe-head.
Watching the film I
made in the wood and walking in it afterwards, it struck me how
seeing a place depicted lends it an aura which, when you visit it for
real, it otherwise wouldn't have. The same effect can be created with
other forms of depiction, literature and simply story-telling. It's
obvious really - you only have to think of the locations of famous
films, images and books. In a way, that aura, though, is only a more
intense, striking version of the aura association and memory lend to
a place anyway.
And when we think about
or visit a place we know, what do we know about it apart from the
aura we've created around it in our minds? The significance we
ascribe to things isn't out there – it's in our heads. If you strip
the aura away, the names we give to the features, the memories, the
associations, what are we left with? Roquentin, the central character
in Jean-Paul Sartre's Nausea, discovers the answer, looking at
the roots of a chestnut tree in the park:
All at once the veil is torn away, I have
understood, I have seen.... The roots of the chestnut tree sank
into the ground just beneath my bench. I couldn't remember it was a
root anymore. Words had vanished and with them the meaning of things,
the ways things are to be used, the feeble points of reference which
men have traced on their surface. I was sitting, stooping over, head
bowed, alone in front of this black, knotty lump, entirely raw,
frightening me. Then I had this vision.